- Published on
Gatsby, gatsby-image, and Netlify CMS
In my previous podcast, I talked about how I have been trying to add Netlify CMS to interglobalmedianetwork.com, my business website. Well, guess, what? I just completed implementing it a little while ago today, and everything works beautifully.
It took a few workarounds, trial and error, asking for help from the Netlfy Community (specifically and especially NetlifyCMS lead developer Shawn Erquhart, @erquhart on Twitter) and experimentation, but I finally brought it together!
The terser issue: still in the picture
The terser issue is still in the picture. Every time I make a change to my
package.json, either adding or removing an npm package, I have to repeat the following steps afterwards:
rm -rf node_modules npx npm-force-resolutions npm i
Why? Because whenever I either add or remove a package related to Gatsby, I receive warnings that various peerDependencies are not installed, and that I have to install them myself. This behavior has been part of npm since version npm@3.
According to npmjs,
Trying to install another plugin with a conflicting requirement will cause an error. For this reason, make sure your plugin requirement is as broad as possible, and not to lock it down to specific patch versions.
Well, as you may remember if you listened to my previous podcast, I added
terser 4.1.2 to my
resolutions object in
package.json. As I also mentioned, this took care of the
source-maps issue and made sure that all packages using
terser were compatible with this version which I added to my
package.json. And that is why I have to repeat my
npm-force-resolutions ritual every time I make Gatsby related changes to my
package.json. This is also why I decided to go with using
npx with the
gatsby-cli, because I got so many warnings about missing peerDependencies when I tried to install it globally. So until Gatsby has resolved its dependency/peerDependency issues across the board, and more specifically the terser/source-maps issue, I will continue executing this pattern whenever I make changes to my
package.json. It's a pain, but it works.
Source-maps still cause a break on build
In order to prevent a break on build due to the
source-maps issue, I still have a custom webpack config added to the bottom of my
gatsby-node.js file. Please refer to the post transcript of this podcast on interglobalmedianetwork.com to view the code snippet.
Things did not stop there, however. I had another issue to address. That of image upload via Netlify CMS and the resulting Netlify CMS compatibility with
gatsby-image and Gatsby
grapql. The original structure of my website was definitely NOT compatible with Netlify CMS. Each post had its own folder. The name of the folder was the post slug, and the markdown file was named
index.md. That was so that I would only have one slug to deal with and not two. Naming
index.md anything but
index.md would result in something like:
By naming the markdown file
index.md, the second post slug would be removed.
But as I said, Netlify CMS does not work with posts contained in their own individual folders containing the
index.md markdown file and any images used in the post.
I had to rename my post markdown files by replacing
index with the post
slug. It ended up looking something like this:
And I removed all the post folders.
content/blog ended up only containing the markdown files and nothing else. I moved the images into the static folder within a subfolder called img. Then I made the necessary adjustments to the Netlify CMS
config.yml related to post images, and made whatever image related adjustments needed in
Gatsby assumes that images are in the same location as the posts. However, Netlify CMS places all images in one place. In the static folder, and then possibly in a subfolder. In my case, a subfolder called img. It is very important that you be consistent across files about the path to your blog post image(s). Double, triple check, and even quadruple check if you have to. I think that ended up being part of my problem and why I threw certain errors.
For example, at one point towards the end of my Netlify CMS journey, I was continuously getting the following error in Terminal on build:
"Field "image" must not have a selection since type "String" has no subfields."
This can be a real bug, and I found in my research that some developers used a Gatsby plugin called
gatsby-remark-relative-images to fix the issue. However, in my case, I found out that it was just an inconsistency in my Netlify CMS image related paths across configuration files.
Once I made sure that all my markdown image paths were the same across configurations,
gatsby-config.js, and all the
post markdown files, everything worked as it should and resulted in a successful build locally and remotely.
Then there is the
gatsby-plugin-netlify-cms-paths. Why this plugin?
gatsby-plugin-netlify-cms-paths changes the file paths in your markdown files to Gatsby friendly paths when using Netlify CMS to edit them.
When this plugin is used, I can embed an image in a markdown file in markdown syntax:
and still be able to access
gatsby-image's "blur-up" behavior.
Suffice it to say, I am using Netlify CMS along with
npm-force-resolutions in production. It is working well thus far, and no problems on remote build. I must say that I was not familiar with the process of forcing resolutions in npm, but once I researched it further, and tested it on interglobalmedianetwork.com, I felt comfortable to use it in production. Just be sure to go through the necessary resolution steps each time you make a change to your package.json. And as I mentioned in my previous podcast,
depending on what (other) packages you are using, it might not work equally across projects.
I will be embedding this episode of Plugging in The Holes along with a transcript in the form of a post on interglobalmedianetwork.com for your hearing and reading pleasure. I will be including the related resource links mentioned in the podcast of course. Always do. Bye for now!